EWG Releases New Guide to Safe Disposable Diapers
It only takes a minute to sign up. In your opinion, how does ResearchGate fit into all of this? Is it really a good way of increasing the visibility of your publications and finding fellows with common research interests, or is it just a "waste of time"? It's hard to predict how this will develop in the future. As is, I have yet to hear any positive success story from my peers.
All I've heard of ResearchGate are complaints about their invitation spam. If you sign up or are already signed upmake sure to carefully check all settings. There are some "hidden" settings that will repeatedly send out "Invitations" and even "Invitation reminders" to your peers make sure to disable this right at signup time, before "claiming" a single paper! You can imagine that if your peer gets a dozen of them each week, he will get annoyed. And ReseachGate uses your name for the invitation, so he will get annoyed at you.
Before "requesting" a paper on Researchgate, make sure they have signed up. Otherwise, use regular email even better, just use regular email right away! When you request a paper from a non-user, they will be sent an invitation letterbut they cannot answer without joining : researchgate does not include contact information in your request!?! Other than that, I have the impression that ResearchGate is mostly used by students, not by established researchers.
Therefore, do not expect much high-quality interactions to happen. If they don't manage to get high-quality interactions happen soon, their name may end up remaining associated with spam.
They may have been too aggressive at boosting their user numbers quickly. The overall idea is goodbut they need to find a way to get quality contributions, not only quantity. As is, I see them only strong on the quantitative side so far If you make it easy for others to build upon your work, they are more likely to do so. In particular, you must make it easier to build upon your work, than on alternatives.T he Simmons children were out past their bedtime.
Frederick Simmons, age 11, and his sister Maliha, age 8, had walked with their parents and 2-year old sister Nyla to the base of the Manhattan bridge in Brooklyn, where demonstrators were protesting the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police officers. No Peace! No racist police! Then, in a moment, everything changed. Suddenly people were sprinting away from the cops—police had deployed either pepper spray or tear gas, nobody was sure—and the Simmons kids were briefly separated.
The family reunited shortly afterwards and the kids were given new instructions: next time they have to run, go towards a wall and not into the crowd, so their parents can find them quickly.
For many black Americans who flooded the streets of dozens of cities this weekend, the killing of George Floyd was the just the latest indignity in a year marked with increasingly unbearable death and despair. On top of all that, a string of killings of black Americans has made the pervasive racial injustice even more acute: Ahmaud Arbery, gunned down by white vigilantes as he jogged in Georgia; Breonna Taylor, an emergency room technician who was shot eight times in her Kentucky home as police executed a no-knock warrant in the middle of the night; and George Floyd, who died after a Minneapolis police officer knelt on his neck for more than eight minutes.
After months of social distancing to avoid spreading COVID, the protests represented a breaking point not just in the fight against racist police violence, but also in the fight against the disease. By gathering in crowds with little chance of social distance, the masked demonstrators risked not just police violence but their own health, all to lend their voices to the chorus demanding an end to racist violence.
But after protesting for years against police killings of black Americans—Michael Brown, Eric Garner, Philando Castile, and thousands of others—some activists say they feel little has changed. In that unnervingly real sense, the battle has entered a new phase.
After they reunited, the Simmons family stayed out. So they trekked about a mile down the road to the Barclays Center, where activists were continuing to demonstrate. Write to Charlotte Alter at charlotte. By Charlotte Alter. Get The Brief. Sign up to receive the top stories you need to know right now. Please enter a valid email address. Sign Up Now. Check the box if you do not wish to receive promotional offers via email from TIME.
Subscribe to RSS
Please take the time to review them carefully. All capitalized terms in these guidelines have the same meaning as in the Terms. We may also restrict, lock, or terminate the account of any advertiser or recruiter who does not comply with these guidelines. Notwithstanding this, you remain responsible for reviewing and ensuring that your Ads, Job Posts, and conduct comply with both these guidelines and all applicable laws. Unless you are responsible for activating your own Ads or Job Posts, please make sure that you provide us with all the information and approvals required for us to set up and deliver your Ads or Job Posts, including all Ad Materials or Job Post Content, at least 3 working days prior to launch.
To make sure that all content on ResearchGate remains high quality, we require that all Ads and Job Posts meet high editorial standards. That means:.
Please note: The primary language that people use to communicate on ResearchGate is English, so any Ad or Job Post that contains content written in another language must be targeted to the appropriate region s. To make sure that all Ads and Job Posts look and feel professional, we have the following rules on the use of images:. Please note: You are responsible for ensuring that you have the necessary rights to use any image, logo, or text that is part of your Ad or Job Post.
To make sure that all Ads and Job Posts on ResearchGate operate smoothly and are easy to interact with, we have these minimum requirements for landing pages:. The main difference is in the way the Ads are built, which also leads to differences in how we deliver them. Because of these differences, these two types have different technical specifications. Responsive Ads offer maximum flexibility with minimum set up. You only need to provide us with the assets we need to build your Ad — including headlines, images, and your landing page — once.
We can then adjust the size, appearance, and format of your Responsive Ad to fit available Ad spaces on ResearchGate, across different devices.
Native ads take on the format or tone of the website they are shown on, with the goal of a seamless user experience.
That means we can increase your reach and impact, while saving you time. So we can build a Responsive Ad that works well across different sizes and styles, your Ad Materials must follow the below specifications:.
5 Methods to Develop Your Online Presence (for Researchers)
The specifications and dimensions are listed below. You can also provide us with third-party tags by approved vendors. Please note: We reserve the right to reject Ads or Ad Materials that contain excessive animation. Subject to our approval, we allow the use of third-party tags to track Banner Ads in accordance with our Business Service Terms. Please read the Terms carefully, especially Section 5 Delivery. Please note: DoubleClick internal redirect tags are preferred.Make use of online sites and networks like LinkedIn and ResearchGate to improve your online visibility and highlight the information about your research that you want others to see.
Much of the activity around the world now takes place online. Researchers store data online, communicate via e-mail, and of course, read scholarly articles published online.
When someone enters your name into Google, what will they find? What do you want them to find? Here are some suggestions for improving your online visibility so that others find the information you want them to see. LinkedIn is a rapidly growing professional networking site. Many of you may already have LinkedIn profiles, but it may be time to improve them to maximize your impact. Your LinkedIn profile may very well be the top item on a Google search using your name, so be sure that the information there is accurate and engaging.
Here are a few specific ideas:. In addition to broad networking sites like LinkedIn or Facebook, there are sites geared specifically toward investigators. These sites provide an opportunity for members to discover new research and sometimes full-text articlesfind collaborators, and maintain another online profile that will show up when someone searches for you.
One well known academic networking site is ResearchGate. On ResearchGate, users can build out their profile with information about their current projects, publications, and institution.
It is an excellent way to connect with others in your field and across the research community. There are also field-specific networking sites that researchers can use, such as Malaria World. Having a presence on a research-specific networking site can benefit your work and open up opportunities for collaboration. Most scientists want to focus on their research when creating an online profile. Here are a couple of sites that specifically focus on your research. Creating and maintaining profiles on these sites will help others become aware of your productivity and help you see the impact your work has on the research community and greater public.
Twitter is increasingly popular among scientists as a place to share opinions and recent publications, with instant feedback possible from colleagues around the world including people you may never have the chance to talk to in person! Consider signing up for a Twitter account and connecting to the sea of colleagues, journals, publishers, universities, and other groups already on Twitter. Some additional thoughts. Lastly, it is very helpful to maintain a current and detailed lab website if applicable.
Researchers do not always have control over their own website, but be sure to tell your university to update your publications list and section about research interests when necessary. Services like WordPress are free and not very difficult to use.Especially when it comes to media, it can difficult to decide what to let a child see at different ages. The rise of the internet has only made this situation more complex and challenging.
After all, the range of internet content offers many things that are not at all suitable for young viewers. Additionally, the popularity of smartphones and digital tablets have become a major source of entertainment for the general public, and especially children.
There is a wide range of apps and online videos aimed at childrenmany of them available free of charge. Toddlers often begin to show an interest in video entertainment and smartphone games. At this early stage in their development, children should be limited to only 1 hour or so of screentime per day.
This also happens to be an age range when limiting screen time for children can be easily adhered to. Children aged 7 to 10 years old will likely be more familiar with their responsibilitiesfrom brushing their teeth and cleaning their rooms, and also to not overuse electronic devices.
Only allow children within this age range to use electronic devices for roughly 90 minutes a day. If your child is using a device for educational purposes, the limit can be increased to around 2 hours.
If they ask to use a device for longer than your pre-determined screentime limit, encourage them to read one of their favorite books or to get some exercise. These activities will serve the same need for stimulation while avoiding becoming too involved with phones and tablets.
If you find your child trying to sneak in extra time with devices at night or during the day without your notice, sit them down and discuss the importance of obedience. Set light disciplinary actions for exceeding the agreed-upon screentime limits. Explain that in the future you could potentially discuss expanding the screentime limits, pending good behavior. If at all possible, try to make their first phone a simple flip phone rather than a smartphone.
This will limit the number of different activities they can use it for. Texting and calling friends should be allowed, up to a point. But children aged 11 to 14 may also start to spend more time on the computer at home.Annotated bibliographies on stroke statistics books
This is why it would be a good idea to use screentime limits that are built into various devices. You can also start to set time limits on specific websites aim for about 2 hours 30 minutes, tops that will shut down access to the site after that time limit has been reached.
By the time your child is in high school, there are a large number of reasons why they may want to spend a significant amount of their free time on a computer or smartphone. These devices offer a means of socializing digitally with their friends while also sharing important moments and achievements from their own life. An internet connection also represents a means by which teens can explore a vast array of subject matter. If your teen is spending the majority of their time at home on an electronic device, then it may be time to sit them down and talk about other, healthy means of socialization.
Set a tentative screen time limit of 3 or 4 hours each day, depending on their specific personality type and daily habits. For most teens, this would probably mean encouraging real-life social activities that are also healthy and wholesome.
It would be entirely possible for someone to simply watch shows on Netflix, Hulu, or any other streaming service for the rest of their life and never even approach the full scope of media offered. And while a certain amount of screen time is necessary for many different professions, we can also control how much time we spend looking at screens outside of work.
Watching a show when you first come home from work can be a great way to unwind after a stressful day. But it can be all too easy to let that show keep playing while you waste away on the couch for another evening.
Try to set a personal screen time limit of 3 hours a day, outside of work-related activities. Home Entertainment Technology Contact Us. The Confidence.ResearchGate is a European commercial social networking site for scientists and researchers  to share papers, ask and answer questions, and find collaborators. While reading articles does not require registration, people who wish to become site members need to have an email address at a recognized institution or to be manually confirmed as a published researcher in order to sign up for an account.
Users may also follow the activities of other users and engage in discussions with them. Users are also able to block interactions with other users. The site has been criticized for sending unsolicited email invitations to coauthors of the articles listed on the site that were written to appear as if the email messages were sent by the other coauthors of the articles a practice the site said it had discontinued as of November  and for automatically generating apparent profiles for non-users who have sometimes felt misrepresented by them.
As of [update]it has more than 15 million users,  with its largest user-bases coming from Europe and North America. ResearchGate publishes an author-level metric in the form of an "RG Score". RG score is not a citation impact measure. RG Scores have been reported to be correlated with existing author-level metrics, but have also been criticized as having questionable reliability and an unknown calculation methodology.Thesis on wheat crop
ResearchGate was founded in  by virologist Dr. The company's first round of funding, inwas led by the venture capital firm Benchmark.
According to The New York Timesthe website began with few features, then was developed further based on input from scientists. The company grew from 12 employees in to in ResearchGate's competitors include Academia.How to write foreign letters on keyboard
A article in BusinessWeek reported that ResearchGate was a "potentially powerful link" in promoting innovation in developing countries by connecting scientists from those nations with their peers in industrialized nations.
It also said that ResearchGate had been involved in several notable cross-country collaborations between scientists that led to substantive developments. Academic reception of ResearchGate remains generally positive, as recent reviews of extant literature show an accepting audience with broad coverage of concepts.
Although ResearchGate is used internationally, its uptake—as of —is uneven, with Brazil having particularly many users and China having few when compared to the number of publishing researchers. A article in Times Higher Education reported that in a global survey of 20, people who use academic social networking sites, ResearchGate was the dominant network and was twice as popular as others: 61 percent of respondents who had published at least one paper had a ResearchGate profile.How to write happy birthday in taiwanese
In the context of the big deal cancellations by several library systems in the world, the wide usage of ResearchGate was credited as one of the factors which reduced the apparent value of the subscriptions to toll access resources. ResearchGate had been criticized by many users for its decision to not remove convicted sex offenders from its social networking site. Many researchers deleted their account in protest as they refused to remove convicted child pornographer and registered sex offender in CanadaBen Levin as a user.
ResearchGate has been criticized for emailing unsolicited invitations to the coauthors of its users. A study published by the Association for Information Systems in found that a dormant account on ResearchGate, using default settings, generated invitations to 38 people over a month period, and that the user profile was automatically attributed to more than publications.
Several studies have looked at the RG score, for which details about how it is calculated are not published. These studies concluded that the RG score was "intransparent and irreproducible",  criticized the way it incorporates the journal impact factor into the user score, and suggested that it should "not be considered in the evaluation of academics".
It was also found to be strongly positively correlated with Quacquarelli Symonds university rankings at the institutional level, but only weakly with Elsevier SciVal rankings of individual authors.
Nature also reported that "Some of the apparent profiles on the site are not owned by real people, but are created automatically — and incompletely — by scraping details of people's affiliations, publication records and PDFs, if available, from around the web.
That annoys researchers who do not want to be on the site, and who feel that the pages misrepresent them — especially when they discover that ResearchGate will not take down the pages when asked.
ResearchGate has also been criticized for failing to provide safeguards against "the dark side of academic writing", including such phenomena as fake publishers, "ghost journals", publishers with "predatory" publication feesand fake impact ratings.
It has also been criticized for copyright infringement of published works. In Septemberlawyers representing the International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers STM sent a letter to ResearchGate threatening legal action against them for copyright infringement and demanding them to alter their handling of uploaded articles to include pre-release checking for copyright violations and "Specifically, [for ResearchGate to] end its extraction of content from hosted articles and the modification of any hosted content, including any and all metadata.
It would also mean an end to Researchgate's own copying and downloading of published journal article content and the creation of internal databases of articles. ResearchGate has managed to achieve an agreement on article uploading with three other major publishers, Springer NatureCambridge University Press and Thieme. Under the agreement, the publishers will be notified when their articles are uploaded but will not be able to premoderate uploads.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Scientific social network. Archived from the original on Retrieved Clear explanations and actionable guidance. SAFe Distilled 5. There was in fact no correlation between exiting phase gates on time and project success…the data suggested the inverse might be true.
Developers and customers have a mutual fiduciary responsibility to ensure that investments in new Solutions will deliver the necessary economic benefits. Otherwise, what is the reason to proceed? Clearly, stakeholders must collaborate in ways that help ensure the potential to realize the prospective economic benefit throughout the development process, versus engaging in wishful thinking until the end.
These phase-gate milestones are not arbitrary. They follow a seemingly logical and sequential process: discovery, requirements, design, development, test, and delivery.
The cause of the problem is the failure to recognize the four critical errors about the assumption that phase gates reveal real progress and thus mitigate risk:. Clearly, the phase-gated model does not mitigate risk as intended. A different approach is needed. Principle 4 — Build incrementally with fast, integrated learning cycles provides elements of the solution to this dilemma. Throughout development, the system is built in increments, each of which is an integration point that demonstrates some evidence of the feasibility of the solution in process.
Unlike phase-gated development, every milestone involves a portion of each step—requirements, design, development, testing—together producing an increment of value see Figure 2. Further, this is done routinely on a cadence Principle 7which provides the discipline needed to ensure periodic availability and evaluation, as well as predetermined time boundaries that can be used to collapse the field of less desirable options.
What is actually measured at these critical integration points is subject to the nature and the type of system being built. But the point is that the system can be measured, assessed, and evaluated by the relevant stakeholders frequently, and throughout the solution development life cycle.Time tracker app - great free ⏰ for tracking your work hours
This provides the financial, technical, and fitness-for-purpose governance needed to ensure that the continuing investment will produce a commensurate return. Clear explanations and actionable guidance SAFe Distilled 5. Figure 1. The problem with phase-gate Milestones The cause of the problem is the failure to recognize the four critical errors about the assumption that phase gates reveal real progress and thus mitigate risk: Centralizing requirements and design decisions in siloed functions that do not actually build the system.
Forcing too-early design decisions and false-positive feasibility. Development proceeds under the assumption that everything is on track. Principle 3 Assuming a point solution exists and can be built correctly the first time. This ignores the variability inherent in the process and provides no legitimate outlet for it.
Variability will find a way to express itself. Making up-front decisions creates large batches of requirements, code, and tests, and long queues. This leads to large-batch handoffs and delayed feedback.
Principle 6 Base Milestones on Objective Evidence Clearly, the phase-gated model does not mitigate risk as intended. Figure 2. Milestones based on objective evaluation of working systems Further, this is done routinely on a cadence Principle 7which provides the discipline needed to ensure periodic availability and evaluation, as well as predetermined time boundaries that can be used to collapse the field of less desirable options.Thesis plural is a teacher certification
Learn More  Oosterwal, Dantar P. Amacom, Neither images nor text can be copied from this site without the express written permission of the copyright holder. Please visit Permissions FAQs and contact us for permissions.
Authors Inbar Oren .
- Speech therapy job duties resume
- Marketing scientific articles inc research
- Math terminologies in algebra book
- How to write weekdays
- Sporting goods in paraguay
- How to list temporary employment on your resume
- Psych major requirements berkeley city council
- Reviews on resume rabbit com
- Paraphrase and citation apa paper citation
- Wyandotte clinic for the working uninsured
- First quarter teleconference supplemental data
- Master course list rutgers commencement tickets
- Queerness in the middle east and south asia
- Social science department textbooks fall
- How to write the about me section
- Custom book review editing services for university
- Help writing ancient civilizations dissertation chapter
- Why is right handedness more common than left handedness
- Help with esl best essay on civil war
- Assignment help sydney ferry terminal schedule